{"id":5510,"date":"2023-06-26T15:18:45","date_gmt":"2023-06-26T15:18:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/adfi-ci.org\/?p=5510"},"modified":"2023-06-26T15:18:45","modified_gmt":"2023-06-26T15:18:45","slug":"aadfi-releases-the-results-of-the-12th-peer-review-of-african-dfis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/adfi-ci.org\/fr\/aadfi-releases-the-results-of-the-12th-peer-review-of-african-dfis\/","title":{"rendered":"AADFI releases the Results of the 12th Peer Review of African DFIs"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

The Association of African Development Finance Institutions (AADFI) has released the report of the 12e<\/sup> Peer Review and Rating of African DFIs based on AADFI Prudential Standards, Guidelines, and Rating System (PSGRS). The AADFI PSGRS is an assessment tool for African DFIs, focusing on governance, operation, financial management, and development Impact. It aims to help the participating institutions identify their weaknesses and strengths and provide solutions to remedy the weaknesses and consolidate the strengths.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For the 12e<\/sup> Peer Review, 32 DFIs submitted to the 2022 annual self-assessment exercise. The self-assessment follows a systematic process that includes the participating institutions\u2019 self-assessment with the PSGRS before submitting their results to their external auditors for validation. Thereafter, the results are submitted to the AADFI Secretariat for further evaluation by an independent consultant to arrive at the PSGRS compliance results.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Institutions that scored 80% and above on the compliance index are further evaluated for the AADFI rating based on their development impact performance. The rating results are classified into three categories (A, B, and C) as follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

La cat\u00e9gorie A regroupe les \u00e9tablissements dont les perspectives de performance \u00e0 moyen terme sont jug\u00e9es tr\u00e8s rassurantes<\/em>; Category B covers institutions whose medium-term performance prospects are considered reassuring<\/em>; while Category C comprises institutions whose medium-term performance prospects are considered fair<\/em> and require strengthening in some areas. The Compliance and Rating results are validated by an independent consultant and approved by the AADFI Peer Review Committee.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Les r\u00e9sultats des auto-\u00e9valuations de 2022 ont r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9 que la performance globale de conformit\u00e9 la plus \u00e9lev\u00e9e a \u00e9t\u00e9 attribu\u00e9e \u00e0 la gouvernance, suivie par la gestion op\u00e9rationnelle et la gestion financi\u00e8re, qui sont rest\u00e9es inchang\u00e9es dans le classement depuis 2021. Cependant, la note moyenne pour les trois domaines combin\u00e9s \u00e9tait l\u00e9g\u00e8rement en baisse en 2022, refl\u00e9tant une l\u00e9g\u00e8re baisse du score de la gestion op\u00e9rationnelle. Au total, 24 IFD \u00e9taient \u00e9ligibles \u00e0 l\u2019exercice de notation en 2022, repr\u00e9sentant 75% des IFD participantes, contre respectivement 86% en 2021 et 81% en 2020.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Le rapport 2022 est publi\u00e9 avec les codes g\u00e9n\u00e9r\u00e9s al\u00e9atoirement attribu\u00e9s \u00e0 chaque institution participant \u00e0 l'exercice pour maintenir la confidentialit\u00e9 des r\u00e9sultats. Cette mesure suit la politique du PSGRS en mati\u00e8re de divulgation des r\u00e9sultats et est conforme \u00e0 la r\u00e9cente d\u00e9cision du conseil d'administration de l'AIAFD. Le code de chaque \u00e9tablissement est communiqu\u00e9 exclusivement \u00e0 l'\u00e9tablissement concern\u00e9.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The full report on the 12e<\/sup>\u00a0Peer Review of African DFIs following the AADFI Assessment Mechanisms can be accessed via this\u00a0<\/em>link<\/em><\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n